Wednesday, December 10, 2008

Who Wants To Be A Slumdog Millionaire?

When we're first introduced to Jamal Malik, he has been winning on the Indian version of "Who Wants To Be A Millionaire" and the police are torturing him to find out how he's cheating. For the bulk of the next two hours, we see the relevant parts of his life story that explain how this impoverished orphan got to be so peculiarly knowledgeable.

The word we're looking for is "Dickensian". That's right, Dickensian.

We see religious riots, beggar factories, gangsters, and strange sorts of enterprise (lightly to heavily criminal) as Jamal and his brother Salim survive and diverge on their paths through life.

Jamal is an exceedingly good character. It's not that he doesn't swindle and steal--he has to, to survive--but given an opportunity to live honestly, he will. His driving force in life is to be united with his true love, Latika.

His brother Salim is jealous of Jamal's affection toward Latika, and this causes innumerable problems. Salim more fully internalizes the horror of the world that he comes from and, in a turn reminiscent of those old '30s Bogie movies, as Jamal walks the straight and narrow and Salim falls in with the neighborhood gangsters.

It's almost old-fashioned except for director Danny Boyle's flair. Boyle seems to be enjoying an artistic peak with his last four films (28 Days Later, Millions and last year's under-rated Sunshine).

The acting is top-notch but you're not likely to have heard of them. Jamal is played by Dev Patel (and a more generic Indian name there isn't), whose only previous credit is the British show "Skins". Madhur Mittal plays Salim, and his only other credit is a minor role the Indian film Say Salaam India (which I think actually played at our local Laemmele, though without subtitles). And "the most beautiful woman in the world" is played by model Freida Pinto in her first role.

"Freida Pinto" sounds Mexican, doesn't it? But she's a Mumbai native! She is, plausibly, the most beautiful woman in the world, too.

The only actor I recognized was the great Irfan Khan, who has also appeared in The Darjeeling Limited, and whose performance in The Namesake was simply unforgettable.

The great thing about Boyle, IMO, is that he's never boring. This is a movie of great depth and art that doesn't seem to belabor the point. The religious riot scene is heavy, but appropriately so. And the whole thing moves along lightly even though it's awash in the desperate poverty and corruption of India. There's a curious optimism there, a buoyancy provided by Jamal who manages to wade through the muck without being spoiled by it.

In the process, he becomes a hero to thousands of impoverished India who see "Millionaire" as a note of hope.

The Boy was a little under the weather and so became fixated on the economics of the two brothers living on the street. He liked it but was sort of unmoved as a result.


  1. Ah, a movie with a plot!

    I have the same problem with books and movies. I want a plot that is relentlessly moving forward. I don't care if it's Pride and Prejudice or Dawn of the Dead, I want something to be happening.

    We watched Apocalypto the other night--have I already brought this up?--and I was so pleased that there was a distinct plot that was surging ahead at all times. I'm not saying it was a masterpiece, but I want more movies like that.

    I realize I'm doing a horrible job of articulating what it is I mean. It's the reason the first Matrix was great and the next two were horrid. (Well I didn't even bother to see the third one.)

  2. Ultimately, that's what stopped me from continuing with my nanowrimo. I didn't feel like the story was moving forward. The writing can be quite bad, I think, as long as the story keeps moving.

  3. I saw the new Indiana Jones last night on pay per view and man it was horrible. What a waste of $4.

    Most movie directors have at best two good movies in them. Both Spielberg and Lucas are long past thier expiration dates.

  4. South Park had the latest movie as a rape scene, i.e., that Indy had been raped. They re-enacted many famous rape scenes with Spielberg & Lucas raping Indy.


    I reviewed the latest one here. My feeling has been that Lucas is a truly great producer but needs to be kept far away from actors and scripts. Spielberg is really a fine director, but he sort of seems sort of unfocused since he got serious.

  5. I want to see this movie now, from the little bit I've read about it here and elsewhere. I'm sort of afraid if it too, though. I hope it ends well for Jamal, is what I'm saying.

  6. Let me just say this: It's not a cynical or nihilistic movie, so however it ends, it's not a refutation of Jamal's general good nature.

    If it were, I would tell you. That, to me, is one of the big indicators for whether I will enjoy a movie.

  7. Very good, blake. That's good enough for me. Thanks!


Grab an umbrella. Unleash hell. Your mileage may vary. Results not typical. If swelling continues past four hours, consult a physician.